Haight Ashbury
Neighborhood Council
Elements of Effective
Community Policing of the Haight-Ashbury
January 2010
“Police strategies and tactics must
be driven by accurate, timely and reliable information supplied by
current and emerging technologies and supported by the Department's
systematic engagement of all of San Francisco's diverse
neighborhoods.” (The SFPD Vision Statement)
Introduction
The Haight-Ashbury is a residential
neighborhood of more than 20,000 people. The overwhelming majority
neither shop nor live on Haight Street. While Haight Street draws
some 10,000 visitors a day in summer, is host to the second largest
street fair in San Francisco and is also a regional destination of
specialty retail shops , it itself has more residential uses than
commercial. Indeed, often times events occurring off Haight street
itself, in Golden Gate Park, for example, effect conditions on Haight
Street. Any attempt to define the neighborhood’s primary policing
needs as being determined by Haight Street misses the needs of the
residents of the neighborhood and would therefore be doomed to be an
expensive failure in the allocation of scarce public resources
contradicting the stated mission of the SFPD to manage “our
resources in a careful, efficient and effective manner” ( SFPD
Mission Statement).
Elements of Effective Community
Policing in the Haight-Ashbury
It is the policy of the SFPD to
establish “Community Oriented Policing and Problem Solving (COPPS)
as an integral part of district station policing” (
Department General Order, 3.11). Applying this policy to the
Haight-Ashbury would have to place the policing of Haight Street in
the context of the community policing needs of the entire
neighborhood.
Below is a list of four primary
elements that would make up an effective and comprehensive “community
policing” effort in the Haight-Ashbury in the opinion of the
Haight-Ashbury Neighborhood Council. The order of presentation of
these elements does not indicate primacy of subject as all four,
combined, must be part of any successful effort.
HAIGHT
STREET
What happens on Haight Street rarely
stays on Haight Street, and oftentimes doesn’t even start on Haight
Street.
The need is for constant, predictable,
visible and persistent patrols on Haight Street, Page Street and
Waller Street from Stanyan to Baker. Additionally, the Panhandle
must be viewed as an integral part of the policing of Haight Street
as the two are linked by both residents and visitors. Foot patrols
should be maximized on Haight Street while regular bicycle patrols
should be the primary means used in the Panhandle. Regular car
patrols can be used to supplement foot patrols for Page and Waller
streets.
Care should be taken by the SFPD to pay
particular attention to the area around Park Station itself,
especially the area around the intersection of Haight and Stanyan, as
it is a heavily used pedestrian, transit and automobile corridor with
major retailers – McDonald’s, Amoeba and the proposed Whole
Foods - joining the Alvord Lake, Children Playground, and Golden
Gate Park pedestrian entrance creating a complex mix of tourist,
visitor, shopper and resident users. Community attempts to smooth
out these complex interactions through more police presence and
various traffic calming proposals should be supported by Park
Station.
GOLDEN GATE PARK
No neighborhood is more directly linked
to activities in Golden Gate Park (GGP) than is the Haight-Ashbury.
The eastern end of GGP is the location of several large public events
from the Aids Walk and Bay to Breakers to Opera in the Park; Kezar
Stadium and Pavilion host both school and professional sporting
events, including major cross town high school rivalries and the AAA
Turkey Day Championship. These events impact the neighborhood and
add to the complex mix on Haight Street. All too often co-ordination
between Park Station, Recreation and Parks Department, event
sponsors, and the neighborhood are poor to barely adequate.
An effective community policing program
in the Haight-Ashbury must emphasize participation and planning
between police, event sponsors , Recreation and Parks and SFMTA to
manage and minimize neighborhood impacts of major events in GGP.
COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS
The Haight-Ashbury has an incredible
array of social, health and service institutions located in the
neighborhood. From UCSF and St Mary’s, to USF, the Urban School,
the French American School, John Adams Community College, three SFUSD
primary schools, scores of residential social services, three
childcare facilities and several board and care facilities the Haight
Ashbury has a daytime population of staff and visitors to these
intuitions that more than doubles the size of the neighborhood on
work days. This huge community institutional base creates both
special needs and special challenges for the institutions themselves,
police and the neighborhood.
For example there needs to be police
presence at pick up and drop off times at the neighborhood’s
schools with particular attention paid pedestrian and parking issues
at day care and primary schools.
Any successful community policing
program in the Haight-Ashbury must have Park Station “at the table”
with these intuitions in an ongoing and predictable manner. Park
Station should view these neighborhood based institutions as
potential resources in dealing with the special needs of certain
populations. The old saying that “when you need a friend it is too
late to make a friend” obtains here. Park station should be
leaning forward in making friends of these community institutions and
their neighbors.
EARTHQUAKE PREAREDINESS
The Haight-Ashbury, given its location
next to GGP, its concentration of major hospitals its large numbers
of schools and social services and its possible large number of
tourists (depending on the time of year) will have a particularly
difficult set of challenges unlike many residential neighborhoods in
the event of a major earthquake. GGP is a major Citywide resource as
a place to temporarily house homeless earthquake victims. St Mary’s
and UCSF will have special demands placed upon them. The
neighborhood’s schools and residential social services may well
have populations with special needs unable to be met in place. The
official plan of San Francisco is that we are all to be on “our
own” for “the first 72 hours”.
While the SFFD is the official “lead
agency” in an earthquake, Park Station must have a plan and that
plan should involve residents, merchants and our “community
institutions”. Park Station along with the SFFD should take the
lead in letting its community partners know what its capability and
needs are in an earthquake. The sooner we know the sooner we will be
able to plan a neighborhood emergency response plan which includes
Park Station and a realistic appraisal of our needs for the first 72
hours during which we will be on our own.
Conclusion
These four elements of an effective
community policing plan can address the general needs of our
neighborhood and also, if augmented by additional discussions and
suggestions from the community, guide the very special needs of any
block in our neighborhood. HANC calls upon Park Station to begin the
“systematic engagement” of the neighbored in the creation of the
Haight Ashbury Comprehensive Community Policing Plan based upon
these, or other, community suggestions.